<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 333 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64810</link>
    <description>Technical assistance payments under royalty agreements were held not to be disallowable merely because they appeared large compared with profits. The Tribunal found that the assessee had produced substantial collaboration and supporting material, that the technical assistance was integral to the business, and that Reserve Bank of India approval existed. It held that reasonableness must be assessed from the businessman&#039;s perspective and that suspicion, without positive material showing excessiveness, sham arrangement, or diversion of profits, cannot justify disallowance. The technical assistance expenditure was therefore allowed and the royalty disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 333 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64810</link>
      <description>Technical assistance payments under royalty agreements were held not to be disallowable merely because they appeared large compared with profits. The Tribunal found that the assessee had produced substantial collaboration and supporting material, that the technical assistance was integral to the business, and that Reserve Bank of India approval existed. It held that reasonableness must be assessed from the businessman&#039;s perspective and that suspicion, without positive material showing excessiveness, sham arrangement, or diversion of profits, cannot justify disallowance. The technical assistance expenditure was therefore allowed and the royalty disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>