<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 456 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64804</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, interest on advances does not accrue for tax purposes where recovery is genuinely doubtful and no real income has arisen. On the facts, the debtor correspondence and dishonoured cheque showed that both principal and interest were uncertain of recovery, so mere book entries could not create taxable income. Applying the real income principle, the addition for accrued interest was not justified and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 456 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64804</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, interest on advances does not accrue for tax purposes where recovery is genuinely doubtful and no real income has arisen. On the facts, the debtor correspondence and dishonoured cheque showed that both principal and interest were uncertain of recovery, so mere book entries could not create taxable income. Applying the real income principle, the addition for accrued interest was not justified and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>