<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 155 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to annul the assessment order due to the invalid reopening of the assessment based on premature reference to the Valuation Officer, inadequacy of the valuation report as new information, and procedural defects in the notice issuance under Section 17. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:22:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 155 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to annul the assessment order due to the invalid reopening of the assessment based on premature reference to the Valuation Officer, inadequacy of the valuation report as new information, and procedural defects in the notice issuance under Section 17. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>