<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64775</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the disallowance of excess interest payment to directors, citing past practices. It also reversed the disallowance of repair expenses treated as capital expenditure, recognizing them as revenue expenses. Additionally, the tribunal annulled the disallowance of claimed travelling expenses, deeming it unjustified. The disallowance under section 80HHC was remanded for reassessment based on evidence provided. Regarding the applicability of sections 215/217 on interest payable, the tribunal deferred to the Assessing Officer for further review. Ground Nos. 6 and 7 were rejected, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64775</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the disallowance of excess interest payment to directors, citing past practices. It also reversed the disallowance of repair expenses treated as capital expenditure, recognizing them as revenue expenses. Additionally, the tribunal annulled the disallowance of claimed travelling expenses, deeming it unjustified. The disallowance under section 80HHC was remanded for reassessment based on evidence provided. Regarding the applicability of sections 215/217 on interest payable, the tribunal deferred to the Assessing Officer for further review. Ground Nos. 6 and 7 were rejected, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>