<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64767</link>
    <description>Section 43B treatment turned on actual payment and consistent accounting: sales tax on a composite sale could not be selectively placed on cash basis while sales remained on mercantile basis, whereas employer fund contributions and hire-purchase sales-tax liability were treated differently on the stated facts. Advertising-disallowance rules distinguished customer-identification and export-order commission expenses from publicity-related items; customary gifts, car repairs and investment allowance received specified relief. A unilateral write-back of excise-duty provision did not create taxable remission where the underlying dispute and security continued. Business expenditure and interest computation obtained relief, while specified stock-valuation and credit-balance claims were not accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:00:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64767</link>
      <description>Section 43B treatment turned on actual payment and consistent accounting: sales tax on a composite sale could not be selectively placed on cash basis while sales remained on mercantile basis, whereas employer fund contributions and hire-purchase sales-tax liability were treated differently on the stated facts. Advertising-disallowance rules distinguished customer-identification and export-order commission expenses from publicity-related items; customary gifts, car repairs and investment allowance received specified relief. A unilateral write-back of excise-duty provision did not create taxable remission where the underlying dispute and security continued. Business expenditure and interest computation obtained relief, while specified stock-valuation and credit-balance claims were not accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>