<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64763</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the revisionary order issued by the CIT. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s order lacking substantial grounds and failing to meet the legal standards required for setting aside the assessment order. Despite acknowledging the Revenue&#039;s representative&#039;s efforts, the Tribunal sided with the assessee due to the lack of merit in the CIT&#039;s decision and the absence of concrete evidence supporting the revisionary order. The decision was based on the insufficiency of grounds provided by the CIT, the failure to establish prejudice to the Revenue, and the lack of proper opportunity for the assessee to present its case effectively during the assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64763</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the revisionary order issued by the CIT. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s order lacking substantial grounds and failing to meet the legal standards required for setting aside the assessment order. Despite acknowledging the Revenue&#039;s representative&#039;s efforts, the Tribunal sided with the assessee due to the lack of merit in the CIT&#039;s decision and the absence of concrete evidence supporting the revisionary order. The decision was based on the insufficiency of grounds provided by the CIT, the failure to establish prejudice to the Revenue, and the lack of proper opportunity for the assessee to present its case effectively during the assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>