<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the ITO on account of security deposits and advances, income from undisclosed sources, and squared-up accounts. The detailed records and agreements presented by the assessee were deemed credible, refuting the Revenue&#039;s suspicions. The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the ITO on account of security deposits and advances, income from undisclosed sources, and squared-up accounts. The detailed records and agreements presented by the assessee were deemed credible, refuting the Revenue&#039;s suspicions. The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>