<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64734</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The addition of Rs. 17,65,790 on account of unexplained investment in building construction was deleted. The disallowance of Rs. 5,000 out of electricity expenses was rejected. The levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 of the Act was to be determined based on the modified income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64734</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The addition of Rs. 17,65,790 on account of unexplained investment in building construction was deleted. The disallowance of Rs. 5,000 out of electricity expenses was rejected. The levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 of the Act was to be determined based on the modified income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>