<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271B of the IT Act, 1961, imposed on the assessee for failing to furnish the audit report along with the return of income. The penalty was canceled as the return filed did not fall under the specified sections requiring the audit report to be attached, thereby dismissing the penalty without the need to establish a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:19:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 69 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271B of the IT Act, 1961, imposed on the assessee for failing to furnish the audit report along with the return of income. The penalty was canceled as the return filed did not fall under the specified sections requiring the audit report to be attached, thereby dismissing the penalty without the need to establish a reasonable cause for the delay in filing the return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>