<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 141 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The addition for alleged under-valuation of closing stock was deleted as the AO failed to justify the assumption of suppressed value. Disallowances related to sales tax liabilities were allowed following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The disallowance under Section 80VV was reduced as it did not cover consultation fees. Disallowance of manufacturing expenses was overturned due to consistent expenses and lack of justification. The addition on account of closing stock of two motors was reduced to align with the cost price. Disallowance of consumable stores expenses was upheld due to ledger discrepancies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 141 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The addition for alleged under-valuation of closing stock was deleted as the AO failed to justify the assumption of suppressed value. Disallowances related to sales tax liabilities were allowed following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The disallowance under Section 80VV was reduced as it did not cover consultation fees. Disallowance of manufacturing expenses was overturned due to consistent expenses and lack of justification. The addition on account of closing stock of two motors was reduced to align with the cost price. Disallowance of consumable stores expenses was upheld due to ledger discrepancies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>