<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 140 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64719</link>
    <description>A purported trust arrangement was held to lack commercial substance where the trust was created with a nominal corpus, the sole trustee was also a beneficiary, and the deed gave wide discretion over the trust fund and beneficiaries&#039; shares. The tribunal found that the original family business continued in substance under the same control, while the lease and re-lease arrangements had no real commercial purpose. Earlier acceptance in routine assessments did not bar scrutiny in a later year because each assessment year is separate and res judicata does not apply. The arrangement was treated as a colourable device to divert business income and avoid tax, and the revenue authorities&#039; finding was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 140 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64719</link>
      <description>A purported trust arrangement was held to lack commercial substance where the trust was created with a nominal corpus, the sole trustee was also a beneficiary, and the deed gave wide discretion over the trust fund and beneficiaries&#039; shares. The tribunal found that the original family business continued in substance under the same control, while the lease and re-lease arrangements had no real commercial purpose. Earlier acceptance in routine assessments did not bar scrutiny in a later year because each assessment year is separate and res judicata does not apply. The arrangement was treated as a colourable device to divert business income and avoid tax, and the revenue authorities&#039; finding was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>