<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64715</link>
    <description>Business deductions and income accrual were examined across excise, expenditure and payment issues. Storage and transit wastage duty and the general excise-duty claim remained disallowed under the earlier position. Legal and consultancy retainers unrelated to income-tax proceedings were deductible as business expenditure. Most cash payments qualified under exceptional circumstances, except one payment where cheque payment was feasible. Molasses loss, full bottle-breakage loss, the CSD excise-duty component and bank-interest expenditure were allowable; irrecoverable advances lacked proof of becoming bad. A pre-accrual waiver of interest, supported by the debtor&#039;s financial condition, prevented taxation of deemed interest under mercantile accounting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:42:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64715</link>
      <description>Business deductions and income accrual were examined across excise, expenditure and payment issues. Storage and transit wastage duty and the general excise-duty claim remained disallowed under the earlier position. Legal and consultancy retainers unrelated to income-tax proceedings were deductible as business expenditure. Most cash payments qualified under exceptional circumstances, except one payment where cheque payment was feasible. Molasses loss, full bottle-breakage loss, the CSD excise-duty component and bank-interest expenditure were allowable; irrecoverable advances lacked proof of becoming bad. A pre-accrual waiver of interest, supported by the debtor&#039;s financial condition, prevented taxation of deemed interest under mercantile accounting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>