<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 286 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 50,000 in the case involving discrepancies in recorded sales of furnace oil by a ship dismantling company. Ship-breaking activity was classified as an industrial undertaking eligible for deductions under ss. 80HH and 80-I, following the Bombay High Court&#039;s ruling. The Tribunal remanded the issue of interest disallowance of Rs. 23,02,796 under s. 40(a)(i) for fresh consideration. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals on the reduction of unaccounted sales and disallowance of expenditure, maintaining consistency with previous assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 286 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 50,000 in the case involving discrepancies in recorded sales of furnace oil by a ship dismantling company. Ship-breaking activity was classified as an industrial undertaking eligible for deductions under ss. 80HH and 80-I, following the Bombay High Court&#039;s ruling. The Tribunal remanded the issue of interest disallowance of Rs. 23,02,796 under s. 40(a)(i) for fresh consideration. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals on the reduction of unaccounted sales and disallowance of expenditure, maintaining consistency with previous assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>