<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 105 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64704</link>
    <description>Clause 5A of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 was treated as creating a statutory liability to pay additional cane price once the grower supplied the requisite cane, with the Second Schedule governing only later quantification. The phrase &quot;if found due&quot; was read as referring to ascertainment of the amount, not to postponement of the liability itself. On the mercantile system, that accrued liability was deductible in the accounting year even though exact computation was completed later. The additional cane price was therefore held to be an accrued, not contingent, liability, and the deduction was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:29:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 105 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64704</link>
      <description>Clause 5A of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 was treated as creating a statutory liability to pay additional cane price once the grower supplied the requisite cane, with the Second Schedule governing only later quantification. The phrase &quot;if found due&quot; was read as referring to ascertainment of the amount, not to postponement of the liability itself. On the mercantile system, that accrued liability was deductible in the accounting year even though exact computation was completed later. The additional cane price was therefore held to be an accrued, not contingent, liability, and the deduction was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>