<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the income generated by the daughter-in-law as a partner in a firm should not be included in the assessee&#039;s total income under Section 64(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the income had only a remote connection with the gift made by the assessee, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and directing modification of the assessment accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the income generated by the daughter-in-law as a partner in a firm should not be included in the assessee&#039;s total income under Section 64(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the income had only a remote connection with the gift made by the assessee, overturning the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and directing modification of the assessment accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>