<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64659</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 10 of the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 is not automatic for a shortfall in compulsory deposit, because section 10(3) requires consideration of the assessee&#039;s explanation and a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Tribunal further noted that compulsory deposit is to be based on the assessee&#039;s estimated current income under sections 3(2) and 4(3)(c). Where the assessee&#039;s principal income was share income from firms and that income was not available by the due date, estimating the deposit on the basis of the last returned income was supported by reasonable cause. Penalty was therefore not exigible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64659</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 10 of the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 is not automatic for a shortfall in compulsory deposit, because section 10(3) requires consideration of the assessee&#039;s explanation and a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Tribunal further noted that compulsory deposit is to be based on the assessee&#039;s estimated current income under sections 3(2) and 4(3)(c). Where the assessee&#039;s principal income was share income from firms and that income was not available by the due date, estimating the deposit on the basis of the last returned income was supported by reasonable cause. Penalty was therefore not exigible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>