<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection. It emphasized the importance of recognizing liabilities related to transactions within the relevant accounting year for tax deduction purposes. Additionally, it reiterated the principles governing the inclusion of genuinely incurred expenses in the cost of assets for depreciation and development rebate calculations, as established by precedent cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:36:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection. It emphasized the importance of recognizing liabilities related to transactions within the relevant accounting year for tax deduction purposes. Additionally, it reiterated the principles governing the inclusion of genuinely incurred expenses in the cost of assets for depreciation and development rebate calculations, as established by precedent cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>