<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64649</link>
    <description>Delay in filing Form No. 11 for firm registration was treated as condonable where the assessee filed it with the return under a bona fide belief, based on wrong legal advice, that this was the correct procedure. The Tribunal held that such good-faith error should not deprive the assessee of the statutory benefit. The delay was condoned, the lower orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Income-tax Officer for decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64649</link>
      <description>Delay in filing Form No. 11 for firm registration was treated as condonable where the assessee filed it with the return under a bona fide belief, based on wrong legal advice, that this was the correct procedure. The Tribunal held that such good-faith error should not deprive the assessee of the statutory benefit. The delay was condoned, the lower orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Income-tax Officer for decision on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>