<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of evidence supporting income concealment. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified, considering the circumstances and explanations provided by the assessee, and distinguished this case from prior judgments cited by the Departmental Representative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:31:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 96 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of evidence supporting income concealment. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified, considering the circumstances and explanations provided by the assessee, and distinguished this case from prior judgments cited by the Departmental Representative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>