<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 61 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64638</link>
    <description>An HUF was found to have reasonable cause for not filing an advance tax estimate where the karta was seriously ill and later died, and no material discredited that explanation. The factual record did not support a finding that the karta was able to attend to the assessee&#039;s income-tax affairs, so the omission was not treated as wilful or unexplained. On that basis, penalty under section 273(c) was held not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 61 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64638</link>
      <description>An HUF was found to have reasonable cause for not filing an advance tax estimate where the karta was seriously ill and later died, and no material discredited that explanation. The factual record did not support a finding that the karta was able to attend to the assessee&#039;s income-tax affairs, so the omission was not treated as wilful or unexplained. On that basis, penalty under section 273(c) was held not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>