<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 44 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64633</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi-D allowed the appeal in a case concerning the validity of an assessment order under section 143(3)(a) of the IT Act for the assessment year 1972-73. The Tribunal admitted the additional ground raised by the assessee challenging the assessment order&#039;s validity. It held that the assessment order&#039;s failure to include the computation of tax or other sums due rendered it invalid, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee without addressing other grounds raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:00:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 44 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64633</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi-D allowed the appeal in a case concerning the validity of an assessment order under section 143(3)(a) of the IT Act for the assessment year 1972-73. The Tribunal admitted the additional ground raised by the assessee challenging the assessment order&#039;s validity. It held that the assessment order&#039;s failure to include the computation of tax or other sums due rendered it invalid, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee without addressing other grounds raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>