<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 77 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64618</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal found that the assessee successfully demonstrated that the failure to report correct income was not due to fraud or wilful neglect. Consequently, the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deemed unjustified. The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, leading to the refund of any penalty amount paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:30:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 77 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64618</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal found that the assessee successfully demonstrated that the failure to report correct income was not due to fraud or wilful neglect. Consequently, the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deemed unjustified. The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, leading to the refund of any penalty amount paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>