<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 61 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64617</link>
    <description>Notional interest could not be brought to tax on advances made to a brother where the accounts showed no agreement to charge interest and no interest was actually received. The family relationship and shared residence without rent did not provide a legal basis to impute interest income, and no material showed any obligation on the assessee to charge interest on the advance. On those facts, addition of notional interest to the assessee&#039;s income was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:29:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 61 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64617</link>
      <description>Notional interest could not be brought to tax on advances made to a brother where the accounts showed no agreement to charge interest and no interest was actually received. The family relationship and shared residence without rent did not provide a legal basis to impute interest income, and no material showed any obligation on the assessee to charge interest on the advance. On those facts, addition of notional interest to the assessee&#039;s income was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>