<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee in a tax case. It upheld the rectification order creating an additional demand of Rs. 3,07,312, directed the AO to allow credit for the seized amount from the date of the regular assessment&#039;s completion, and ruled that no interest is chargeable under section 217 on the TDS amount of Rs. 1,97,140. However, the claim for interest on the seized amount for the period it was retained by the Department was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee in a tax case. It upheld the rectification order creating an additional demand of Rs. 3,07,312, directed the AO to allow credit for the seized amount from the date of the regular assessment&#039;s completion, and ruled that no interest is chargeable under section 217 on the TDS amount of Rs. 1,97,140. However, the claim for interest on the seized amount for the period it was retained by the Department was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>