<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 56 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the penalty should not be imposed in a scenario where the tax was paid, and rectification was sought for the technical mistake of filing an unsigned return, in line with the provisions of the Wealth Tax Act and the spirit of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:26:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 56 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the penalty should not be imposed in a scenario where the tax was paid, and rectification was sought for the technical mistake of filing an unsigned return, in line with the provisions of the Wealth Tax Act and the spirit of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>