<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 180 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, denying the appellant&#039;s claim for a refund of excess tax deducted at source. It was held that once a TDS certificate is issued, only the payee can claim the refund, and the payer&#039;s right to appeal under section 248 ceases. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s order legally valid, protecting revenue interests. The appellant&#039;s arguments were dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:14:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 180 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, denying the appellant&#039;s claim for a refund of excess tax deducted at source. It was held that once a TDS certificate is issued, only the payee can claim the refund, and the payer&#039;s right to appeal under section 248 ceases. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s order legally valid, protecting revenue interests. The appellant&#039;s arguments were dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>