<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 185 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64591</link>
    <description>In wealth-tax assessment, an asset value cannot be substituted through rectification on the basis of a valuation report received after completion of assessment, because valuation is an estimation exercise and later material cannot retrospectively justify alteration. A factory building transferred for full consideration, with possession delivered and enjoyed by the transferee, was not includible in the transferor-company&#039;s net wealth on the valuation date, reflecting the relevance of beneficial ownership over bare legal title. For adjoining land, rent-capitalisation was accepted as the proper valuation method, and the appellate multiplier was treated as reasonable on the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 185 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64591</link>
      <description>In wealth-tax assessment, an asset value cannot be substituted through rectification on the basis of a valuation report received after completion of assessment, because valuation is an estimation exercise and later material cannot retrospectively justify alteration. A factory building transferred for full consideration, with possession delivered and enjoyed by the transferee, was not includible in the transferor-company&#039;s net wealth on the valuation date, reflecting the relevance of beneficial ownership over bare legal title. For adjoining land, rent-capitalisation was accepted as the proper valuation method, and the appellate multiplier was treated as reasonable on the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>