<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 179 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the ex parte assessment under section 144 and the additions under section 68. It rejected the appellant&#039;s claims regarding the inadequacy of the show-cause notice and found the appellant&#039;s counsel guilty of professional misconduct. The Tribunal partially allowed the rectification petition, deciding to rectify specific mistakes without recalling the entire order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 179 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the ex parte assessment under section 144 and the additions under section 68. It rejected the appellant&#039;s claims regarding the inadequacy of the show-cause notice and found the appellant&#039;s counsel guilty of professional misconduct. The Tribunal partially allowed the rectification petition, deciding to rectify specific mistakes without recalling the entire order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>