<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 122 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64583</link>
    <description>Chapter XXA acquisition proceedings must be supported at initiation by relevant material showing a rational nexus with the belief under section 269C(1); statutory presumptions under section 269C(2) cannot themselves establish jurisdiction. The article notes that, on the facts discussed, comparable sales supported the declared consideration, the valuation report ignored material property disadvantages, and the fair market value was not shown to exceed the apparent consideration by the requisite statutory margin. An acquisition order resting only on presumptions and lacking independent findings of understatement or illicit object is therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 122 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64583</link>
      <description>Chapter XXA acquisition proceedings must be supported at initiation by relevant material showing a rational nexus with the belief under section 269C(1); statutory presumptions under section 269C(2) cannot themselves establish jurisdiction. The article notes that, on the facts discussed, comparable sales supported the declared consideration, the valuation report ignored material property disadvantages, and the fair market value was not shown to exceed the apparent consideration by the requisite statutory margin. An acquisition order resting only on presumptions and lacking independent findings of understatement or illicit object is therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>