<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 122 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64583</link>
    <description>Acquisition under Chapter XXA requires relevant material establishing a rational and direct nexus with the belief required for initiation. Statutory presumptions of understatement cannot be treated as conclusive at that stage or replace independent proof of understatement or an illicit object. Comparable sales supported the apparent consideration, while the valuation report did not account for material disadvantages affecting the property. As the fair market value was not proved to exceed the apparent consideration by the requisite statutory margin, the acquisition order lacked the statutory conditions for validity and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 122 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64583</link>
      <description>Acquisition under Chapter XXA requires relevant material establishing a rational and direct nexus with the belief required for initiation. Statutory presumptions of understatement cannot be treated as conclusive at that stage or replace independent proof of understatement or an illicit object. Comparable sales supported the apparent consideration, while the valuation report did not account for material disadvantages affecting the property. As the fair market value was not proved to exceed the apparent consideration by the requisite statutory margin, the acquisition order lacked the statutory conditions for validity and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>