https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64562 The case involved challenges to the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (CWT) under section 25 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the validity of a wealth-tax assessment order, conflicts between income-tax and wealth-tax assessment findings, and the adequacy of the enquiry conducted by the Wealth-tax Officer (WTO). The majority opinion, concurring with Judge V.P. Elhence, held that the CWT's decision to set aside the assessment was not justified. The wealth-tax assessment by the WTO was upheld, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:46:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64562 The case involved challenges to the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (CWT) under section 25 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the validity of a wealth-tax assessment order, conflicts between income-tax and wealth-tax assessment findings, and the adequacy of the enquiry conducted by the Wealth-tax Officer (WTO). The majority opinion, concurring with Judge V.P. Elhence, held that the CWT's decision to set aside the assessment was not justified. The wealth-tax assessment by the WTO was upheld, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Wed, 29 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64562