<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the department, holding that no separate deduction under section 80-I could be granted for each minor child&#039;s income as the income had been clubbed under section 64(1A) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent behind the provisions and concluded that only one deduction could be allowed, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision and overturning the CIT(Appeals) order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the department, holding that no separate deduction under section 80-I could be granted for each minor child&#039;s income as the income had been clubbed under section 64(1A) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent behind the provisions and concluded that only one deduction could be allowed, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision and overturning the CIT(Appeals) order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>