<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 161 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64533</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 30,460 under Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act, citing interrelation between parties and lack of agreement. However, the Tribunal allowed the investment allowance claim of Rs. 5,116 under Section 32-A, recognizing the appellant&#039;s activities as manufacturing based on the transformation of yarn into sewing machine threads. The appeal was dismissed in part, with the investment allowance granted based on the majority opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:12:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 161 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64533</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 30,460 under Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act, citing interrelation between parties and lack of agreement. However, the Tribunal allowed the investment allowance claim of Rs. 5,116 under Section 32-A, recognizing the appellant&#039;s activities as manufacturing based on the transformation of yarn into sewing machine threads. The appeal was dismissed in part, with the investment allowance granted based on the majority opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>