<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 149 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to establish the necessary satisfaction of the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the notice issued under section 148 was also deemed invalid. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. Other issues such as the disallowance of gratuity liability, home office expenses, and service charges were not extensively addressed due to the invalidation of the reassessment proceedings. The assessee retained the right to challenge these disallowances if the decision was overturned by a higher court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 149 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to establish the necessary satisfaction of the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the notice issued under section 148 was also deemed invalid. The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. Other issues such as the disallowance of gratuity liability, home office expenses, and service charges were not extensively addressed due to the invalidation of the reassessment proceedings. The assessee retained the right to challenge these disallowances if the decision was overturned by a higher court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>