<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, determining that the transfer of shares should be classified as &quot;capital gains&quot; rather than an adventure in the nature of trade. The issue of notional capital gains was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of the Tribunal&#039;s decision, with directions to provide a fair opportunity to both parties and to reassess the deduction under section 54-E.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:39:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 169 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, determining that the transfer of shares should be classified as &quot;capital gains&quot; rather than an adventure in the nature of trade. The issue of notional capital gains was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of the Tribunal&#039;s decision, with directions to provide a fair opportunity to both parties and to reassess the deduction under section 54-E.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>