<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 115 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64457</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi-D upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) for late submission of the return for the assessment year 1981-82. The assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under section 10(22A) was rejected as it was not made during the assessment proceedings. The ITAT ruled that the penalty under sub-section (3) of section 271 was applicable despite the income not exceeding the non-taxable limit. The counsel&#039;s argument citing advice from previous counsel was dismissed for lack of evidence. The ITAT emphasized that tax laws do not consider equity arguments for charitable trusts in penalty proceedings, affirming the penalty for late submission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 115 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64457</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi-D upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) for late submission of the return for the assessment year 1981-82. The assessee&#039;s claim of exemption under section 10(22A) was rejected as it was not made during the assessment proceedings. The ITAT ruled that the penalty under sub-section (3) of section 271 was applicable despite the income not exceeding the non-taxable limit. The counsel&#039;s argument citing advice from previous counsel was dismissed for lack of evidence. The ITAT emphasized that tax laws do not consider equity arguments for charitable trusts in penalty proceedings, affirming the penalty for late submission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>