<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 110 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 32AB, concluding that the deposit was not made within the prescribed time frame. The appeal filed by the assessee was accordingly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:30:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 110 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 32AB, concluding that the deposit was not made within the prescribed time frame. The appeal filed by the assessee was accordingly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>