<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the ITO to ascertain if the loan, when combined with other loans, surpassed 75% of the market value of the charged assets as of November 7, 1981. If it did not exceed this threshold, the disallowance under section 40A(8) would not be applicable; otherwise, it would. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, pending the ITO&#039;s further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the ITO to ascertain if the loan, when combined with other loans, surpassed 75% of the market value of the charged assets as of November 7, 1981. If it did not exceed this threshold, the disallowance under section 40A(8) would not be applicable; otherwise, it would. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, pending the ITO&#039;s further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>