<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the IAC (Assessment)&#039;s order under section 154 and allowing the full extra shift allowance (ESA) claim for the 5-ton electric arc furnace. The judgment highlighted the significance of considering the overall concern rather than individual machinery operation days when calculating ESA, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and citing relevant precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:45:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the IAC (Assessment)&#039;s order under section 154 and allowing the full extra shift allowance (ESA) claim for the 5-ton electric arc furnace. The judgment highlighted the significance of considering the overall concern rather than individual machinery operation days when calculating ESA, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and citing relevant precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>