<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64397</link>
    <description>For long-term capital asset classification under the Income-tax Act, &quot;held&quot; denotes actual holding and is not confined to registered ownership. Possession of land, substantial prior payment of consideration and supporting evidence such as property-tax payment may establish a holding period exceeding 60 months, enabling long-term capital gains treatment and the related deduction. Conversely, possession and substantial payment alone do not establish that legal title transferred before execution of a registered conveyance where evidence of an earlier transfer is insufficient. The distinction preserves actual holding as relevant for the holding-period test while requiring adequate proof of title transfer in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64397</link>
      <description>For long-term capital asset classification under the Income-tax Act, &quot;held&quot; denotes actual holding and is not confined to registered ownership. Possession of land, substantial prior payment of consideration and supporting evidence such as property-tax payment may establish a holding period exceeding 60 months, enabling long-term capital gains treatment and the related deduction. Conversely, possession and substantial payment alone do not establish that legal title transferred before execution of a registered conveyance where evidence of an earlier transfer is insufficient. The distinction preserves actual holding as relevant for the holding-period test while requiring adequate proof of title transfer in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>