<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 114 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s request to refer an additional question of law regarding the calculation of deduction for certain assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized that raising a completely new issue would require a fresh application, which could be time-barred. As the additional question was unrelated to the original issue, the Tribunal held that the applicant must decide on the issues to take to the High Court within the permitted timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 114 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s request to refer an additional question of law regarding the calculation of deduction for certain assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized that raising a completely new issue would require a fresh application, which could be time-barred. As the additional question was unrelated to the original issue, the Tribunal held that the applicant must decide on the issues to take to the High Court within the permitted timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>