<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 129 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 was not justified. The Tribunal considered the explanations provided by the assessee to be bona fide and deemed the taxability of the amounts received to be highly debatable. Consequently, the penalty was not upheld, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 129 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 was not justified. The Tribunal considered the explanations provided by the assessee to be bona fide and deemed the taxability of the amounts received to be highly debatable. Consequently, the penalty was not upheld, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>