<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that for computing the deduction under section 80HHC, profits must first be reduced by the deduction allowed under section 80-IB, aligning with section 80-IA(9) to prevent repeated deductions of the same profits. The decision in Rogini Garments was upheld, emphasizing that section 80-IA(9) applies to all relevant Chapter VI-A provisions. The Tribunal rejected liberal interpretations allowing repeated deductions, adhering to the clear statutory language.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that for computing the deduction under section 80HHC, profits must first be reduced by the deduction allowed under section 80-IB, aligning with section 80-IA(9) to prevent repeated deductions of the same profits. The decision in Rogini Garments was upheld, emphasizing that section 80-IA(9) applies to all relevant Chapter VI-A provisions. The Tribunal rejected liberal interpretations allowing repeated deductions, adhering to the clear statutory language.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>