https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64369 The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions. It confirmed the use of the Government valuer's report for determining the property's cost of acquisition and upheld the deletion of unexplained cash deposits for both parties. The Tribunal also partly allowed the cross-objection of one party by deleting an addition of Rs. 2.58 lakhs, while dismissing the other cross-objections as they became infructuous following the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals. en-us Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64369 The Tribunal dismissed all four appeals by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions. It confirmed the use of the Government valuer's report for determining the property's cost of acquisition and upheld the deletion of unexplained cash deposits for both parties. The Tribunal also partly allowed the cross-objection of one party by deleting an addition of Rs. 2.58 lakhs, while dismissing the other cross-objections as they became infructuous following the dismissal of the Revenue's appeals. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64369