<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64364</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in their entirety, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. The Tribunal confirmed that interest on overdue license fee, royalty payable to the Wireless Planning Commission, and fees paid to the Registrar of Companies were deductible on an accrual basis, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on Sections 35ABB and 43B of the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64364</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in their entirety, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds. The Tribunal confirmed that interest on overdue license fee, royalty payable to the Wireless Planning Commission, and fees paid to the Registrar of Companies were deductible on an accrual basis, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments based on Sections 35ABB and 43B of the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>