<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment for the year 2001-02 due to improper service of notice under Section 143(2) of the IT Act. It found that the service by affixture was invalid without a court order, and there was a lack of due diligence in serving the notice at the correct address. Additionally, procedural requirements under the CPC, such as the verification of the serving officer&#039;s affidavit, were not met. The Tribunal also noted the absence of evidence for a notice sent by registered post. Consequently, the assessment was invalidated, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment for the year 2001-02 due to improper service of notice under Section 143(2) of the IT Act. It found that the service by affixture was invalid without a court order, and there was a lack of due diligence in serving the notice at the correct address. Additionally, procedural requirements under the CPC, such as the verification of the serving officer&#039;s affidavit, were not met. The Tribunal also noted the absence of evidence for a notice sent by registered post. Consequently, the assessment was invalidated, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>