<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 261 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they were not in default under Section 201 for failing to deduct taxes on employees&#039; remuneration. The Tribunal held that the remuneration of expatriates was exempt under Article 14(2) of the DTAA with France as they met the conditions for exemption. The Tribunal disagreed with the misinterpretation of Article 14(2) and the application of Section 44BB, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and rejecting the charging of interest under Section 201(1A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 261 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they were not in default under Section 201 for failing to deduct taxes on employees&#039; remuneration. The Tribunal held that the remuneration of expatriates was exempt under Article 14(2) of the DTAA with France as they met the conditions for exemption. The Tribunal disagreed with the misinterpretation of Article 14(2) and the application of Section 44BB, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and rejecting the charging of interest under Section 201(1A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>