<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64350</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the business was set up on 28th July 1994, allowing revenue expenses from that date. It directed the AO to consider 1/3rd of entertainment expenses as non-disallowable, attributing them to employees&#039; participation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on miscellaneous expenses, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Thus, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64350</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the business was set up on 28th July 1994, allowing revenue expenses from that date. It directed the AO to consider 1/3rd of entertainment expenses as non-disallowable, attributing them to employees&#039; participation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on miscellaneous expenses, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Thus, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>