<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 208 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, confirming the addition of income from gifts as undisclosed income due to the lack of genuine documentation and financial incapacity of the donors. It upheld the levy of interest under Sections 234A and 234B, considering it mandatory and compensatory due to the assessee&#039;s failure to file a return or pay advance tax. The reassessment under Section 147 was dismissed for want of prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 208 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, confirming the addition of income from gifts as undisclosed income due to the lack of genuine documentation and financial incapacity of the donors. It upheld the levy of interest under Sections 234A and 234B, considering it mandatory and compensatory due to the assessee&#039;s failure to file a return or pay advance tax. The reassessment under Section 147 was dismissed for want of prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>