<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the payments made by the appellant to the C&amp;amp;FR agents were not in the nature of rent, leading to the inapplicability of Section 194-I for tax deduction. Consequently, the orders under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were deemed invalid and canceled. The appeal favored the appellant, resulting in a successful outcome for them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 297 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the payments made by the appellant to the C&amp;amp;FR agents were not in the nature of rent, leading to the inapplicability of Section 194-I for tax deduction. Consequently, the orders under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were deemed invalid and canceled. The appeal favored the appellant, resulting in a successful outcome for them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>