<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 321 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of the addition as a perquisite under s. 17(1)(iv) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the strict interpretation of exemption clauses in fiscal laws and the need to adhere to statutory conditions for exemptions like those under s. 10(5B) of the Act. The matter concerning the exemption under s. 10(5B) was remanded back to the AO for a detailed evaluation of facts and evidence before making a decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:44:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 321 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of the addition as a perquisite under s. 17(1)(iv) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the strict interpretation of exemption clauses in fiscal laws and the need to adhere to statutory conditions for exemptions like those under s. 10(5B) of the Act. The matter concerning the exemption under s. 10(5B) was remanded back to the AO for a detailed evaluation of facts and evidence before making a decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>